"The dirtiest book of all is the expurgated book". ~Walt Whitman
THE “B” WORD IS
BALDERDASH!
by
Joe Sinclair
When someone mentions the "B" word, three words
used to
spring to my mind: BITCH, BOWDLER*, and BLEEP. I have just added a
fourth: BALDERDASH.
It never ceases to amaze me that the word “bitch” is
apparently regarded as a seriously unacceptable breach of propriety in
America, while it is considered little more than a mild epithet in England,
where it has no deeper connotation (except as the female of “dog”) than does
“mare”, “cow”, or “sow”, all of which might equally be used to express
displeasure with the distaff side.
But I have only to tune in to one of those prime time
American TV shows, Judge Judy say, to find the “B” word constantly
bowdlerised
to its initial letter, or "bleeped out", or – since, in my case, my hearing requires the
use of subtitles – blanked out totally on the screen.
Even more ridiculous, in fact, than the initialization of
the word, is its metonymic adaptation to make it acceptable, when everyone knows what is meant and the
entire word is echoing through our brains.

The censorship of public broadcast language is most
prevalent (at least amongst the major broadcasting nations) in America and
Japan, and to a lesser extent England. France, Spain, the Netherlands,
Germany, Poland and Italy, for example, are much more liberal towards
swearing, more averse to censorship and, possibly, more inclined to avoid
obscenity in the first place.
In America the Federal Communications Commission, the
official body responsible for protecting the public from this perceived
menace to its morals, has for many years been involved in a number of
debates and disputes over its censorship's apparent conflict with the First
Amendment to the U.S. Constitution - the one dealing with freedom of
expression.
This has involved a number of rulings by the United States Supreme Court, of
which the most current is the definition of offensiveness where:
-
An average person, applying contemporary community
standards, must find that the material, as a whole, appeals to the
prurient interest;
-
The material must depict or describe, in a patently
offensive way, sexual conduct specifically defined by applicable law;
and
-
The material, taken as a whole, must lack serious
literary, artistic, political or scientific value.
This clearly goes way beyond the brief we have set
ourselves for this article, namely the objection to the use of certain words
in the media. Nevertheless, the Supreme Court decision was made at least
partly if not mainly as the result of a George Carlin sketch. In 1972
George Carlin released an album of stand-up comedy in which he described
"seven words you can never say on television". These are shit,
piss, fuck, cunt, cocksucker, motherfucker and tits. When he
subsequently performed his routine in Milwaukee he was arrested for
disturbing the peace. A year later he performed a similar routine that was
broadcast uncensored by station WBAI .without repercussion.
A George Carlin You-Tube clip featuring the
seven-letter word routine
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lqvLTJfYnik
Our "B" word, unsurprisingly, does not appear in the
list. Later, however, the comedian Lenny Bruce compiled a list of his
own, six of which coincided with Carlin's. Of the two additional words on
Bruce's list, one was a "B" word of his own, namely Balls.
Personally I find balls as inoffensive as bitch. Again, this may be a
simple sociolinguistical distinction between the UK and the US.
So who decides what is obscene and what is not?
Since the mid-nineteenth century the definition (framed on the results of
earlier court cases) has been "whether the tendency of the matter charged as
obscenity is to deprave and corrupt those whose minds are open to such
immoral influences, and into whose hands a publication of this sort may
fall."
In the United States, following on from what we stated
earlier, the courts have held that indecent material is
protected by the First Amendment and cannot be banned entirely. It may,
however, be restricted in order to avoid being broadcast during times of the
day when there is a reasonable risk that children may be in the audience.
The watershed(1)
is delimited by the hours of 6.00 am and 10.00 pm. Outside these hours
children, whom this regulation is designed to protect, may be supposed to be
asleep. This is rather wider than has been determined for the United
Kingdom. I guess our children are deemed to need more sleep than their
cousins across the "Pond".
Moving eastwards now, we learn from the news agency Pravda [July 2013] that
Russia, too, has decided to ensure its children are protected from the
dangers of exposure to indecency, obscenity and profanity.
"State Duma Deputy
Yelena Mizulina intends to make further
amendments to the Law "On the Protection
of Children." The chairwoman of the
Committee on Family, Women and Children
put forward a suggestion to punish
people for using dirty language in
social networks.
"According to
politician, the pages full of posts and
messages containing swear words, will
have to be blocked within 24 hours, if
harmful information is not deleted. This
should apply to pages on social
networks, websites, and various forums.
According to Mizulina, children can
begin to see profanity as a norm. It is
assumed that possible innovations will
be discussed on July 30th.2013.
"The law "On the
protection of children from information
harmful to their health and development"
was enacted in Russia on 1 September
2012. The law introduced a register of
banned sites. In addition, books,
concerts, TV programs and other
information is now marked with special
marks limiting the age of the audience.
"Noteworthy, United
Russia deputy Vitaly Milonov put forward
a similar initiative on 25 July. He
proposed to tighten control over social
networks and allow people to dating
sites are through their passports.
"The chairman of the
Moscow Regional Bar Association, PhD,
Associate Professor Sergei Smirnov
commented the proposal from State Duma
deputy Elena Mizulina.
"I have not seen
anything like this in our laws. Foul
language is obscene vocabulary, which is
not common to use in communication and
in business relations. When people
express their thoughts or emotions with
the use of profanity, many are offended
by it. Obscene lexicon is equated to
disorderly conduct, there is an
appropriate article in the Code of
Administrative Offences."The scientific
and technological progress is advancing,
people communicate not only in the real
world, but also in the virtual world.
Children and students often use the
Internet. For some, the Internet is a
half of their life. So, it's time to
initiate and adopt such amendments. I
think the idea of deputy Mizulina is
relevant and timely.
"Obscene language
offends both children and adults. A ban
on its use is not an infringement of
human rights. This is a direction
towards a civilized lifestyle. If we do
not use foul language in real life, then
why do we use it on the Internet? Deputy
Mizulina calls to protect vulnerable
layers of the population - particularly
children. I think that this initiative
should be supported," the lawyer told
Pravda.Ru."
Pornography laws by region

[Click on thumbnail for full size picture]
Green is legal
Yellow is legal with some restrictions
Red is illegal
Grey data is unavailable
* Thomas Bowdler
(1754-1825) has contributed his name to posterity, having produced and
published an expurgated version of the entire works of William Shakespeare.
Nowaays the adjectival "bowdlerise" is commonly associated with
censorship of literature, films and television.
(1) This is what we
Brits call it. To the Americans it is a "Safe Harbour".