(Click on the title to be taken to the review, or on the reviewer's name for biodata, or simply scroll down the page)
The Story of Life by Richard Southwood - Reviewer Gill Ewing
The History of Astronomy by Michael Hoskin.- Reviewer John Ewing
Linguistics by P.H. Matthews - Reviewer Joe Sinclair
Language Matters by Donna Jo Napoli - Reviewer Joe Sinclair
The Teacher's Toolkit by Paul Ginnis - Reviewer Mark Edwards
Globalization by Manfred B. Steger - Reviewer Sylvia Farley
Intercultural Management by Nina Jacob - Reviewer Michael Mallows
Accelerating Performance by Sunny Stout Rostran - Reviewer Rosie Harrison
Schizophrenia by Chris Frith and Eve C. Johnstone - Reviewer Abigail Freeman
The
Story of Life by
Richard Southwood. Published January 2003 by Oxford University
Press. (Hardback)
272 pages, numerous, maps figures and line drawings, ISBN 0-19-852590-7.
Price £19.99.
You
may think that a book which purports to tell "The Story of Life" in
under 260 pages could not be other than a superficial skimming of 4.5 billion
years of Earth history. Well, you would be mistaken - as Richard Southwood
demonstrates in this fascinating little book.
Here
are to be found all the
usual topics in a book of this sort, but you would be wrong to believe
that this is just another account of life from chemistry to man. Here is a book which is not only extremely readable, but gives an amazing amount
of carefully chosen detail, filling in many of the gaps left by other writers on
the subject.
I particularly like the fact that the author is not afraid to use graphs and charts to illustrate a point. All are easy to interpret and genuinely contribute to our understanding of the text. A geological time chart on the inside front cover facilitates reference whilst reading the book.
In
his introduction, the author describes the story of life as being like a
kaleidoscope, where every now and then a shake changes the components and the
picture, the "shakes" being environmental changes of various kinds,
due to climatic, extra-terrestrial bombardment, plate tectonic-generated
catastrophes and so on. With carefully selected images from each kaleidoscopic
picture, he gives us a succinct coverage of evolution from primitive microscopic
stirrings in primordial seas to the current epitome of primate life: ourselves.
He
does not simply recite an unfolding history of life however, but includes the
how and the why – involving the entire Earth in the story, with plate
tectonics, atmospheric changes, how the various components of the Earth work
together to promote this or destroy that – how the Earth engine works in fact.
He even takes the time to explain the classification of life forms, the new
science of cladistics which matches features rather than entire life forms, so
that new and interesting insights can be made into our origins. Brief overviews
of simple chemistry and biology help us understand how life evolved in different
types of habitat and the main life forms of each geological era are discussed in
a few words at surprising depth. Illustrations are excellent and I particularly
liked the map at the beginning of each new chapter, showing where today's
continents lay at the time in question – even to a predicted map of the future
world given at the end.
This book goes further than the usual pop science offerings in a history of life, in fewer pages, and with greater skill and readability than many others. If you want to know more about where we came from written in an authoritative, compelling style, then this book is for you. I guarantee you won't be able to put it down.
Gill Ewing
The
History of Astronomy by Michael Hoskin. Oxford University
Press (Very Short Introduction series)
123 pp incl. index, glossary and bibliography ISBN
0-19-280306-9 £6.99
Let's
start with the bottom line: Michael Hoskins "History of Astronomy"
comes out with two small frowns and a big happy grin. Let's get the frowns out
of the way first.
The first concerns diagrams. The book contains about twenty, roughly one
for every five pages of text, which seems reasonable. However, some of the
basic concepts, such as the celestial equator and the apparent retrograde motion
of planets, are explained without diagrams, and I find myself wondering if any
non-astronomer picking up this book would be entirely comfortable with this.
I have been familiar with the terminology for a good forty years, yet at times I
could have wished for a diagram or two more to show the relation between what
the observers thought and what was really there. In the later passages, it
is true, such phenomena as aberration are well illustrated, but in the early
stages, where the reader might need a little enticement, a few more pictures
would be a help.
My second frown concerns Artistarchus of Samos. In its review of world systems,
the book proceeds from the geocentric theories of Plato and Aristotle to that of
Ptolemy, then leaps forward to Copernicus, introducing his heliocentric theory
as if he were the first to promulgate the idea: yet every historian of science
knows that Aristarchus proposed a heliocentric theory almost one thousand years
earlier. However, I can postulate a reason for the omission: the book
follows the ideas that prevailed in humanity's world-view, and
Aristarchus's ideas, pooh-poohed by Archimedes, did not prevail.
Furthermore, astronomy is a vast subject, and many people must be omitted from
such a short work: but all the same, I have a soft spot for poor old
Aristarchus, who so very nearly hit the nail on the head before the Church got
its iniquitous choke-hold on cosmogony, and I would have liked to see at least a
nod in his direction.
Having got that off my chest, I can spend the rest of this Very Short Review in
saying that I thoroughly enjoyed the rest of the book. It offers a
fast ride through the Greats who emerged from the Renaissance - Copernicus,
Galileo, Brahe, Kepler, and Newton - but in doing so it never fails to point out
the essentials of their work, and how each in turn contributed to the eventual
emergence of a correct picture of the Solar System. It points out, too,
the difficulties of observing before telescopes and with instruments that warped
as the seasons changed; and it conveys a sense of wonder at how people could
work to such wonderfully close tolerances in such conditions.
Fascinatingly, it also shows something of the interaction between Robert Hooke
and Newton: reading these passages, I could feel the frustration that must have
been building in Hooke's breast as so many of his proposals were taken up,
worked out in detail by Newton, shown to fit the data, and published with only
the name of Isaac Newton upon them.
With the Newtonian theory of gravitation the book reaches a climax:
thereafter, it moves on through the steady parade of triumphs that succeeded.
This makes good reading, and Hoskins tells it well: the elation that astronomers
must have felt as puzzles were resolved and discovery followed discovery comes
through, and is quite contagious. So for all my initial quibbles, I can
say sincerely that this is a grand little book, and well worth the hour or two
it will take you to read it.
So now I'm going to order one of his longer works, and see what he thinks about
Aristarchus.
John
Ewing
Linguistics
by P.H. Matthews. Oxford University Press (Very Short
Introduction series)
148 pages. ISBN 0-19-280148-1. £6.99
For
a long time in the past it was usual to find Linguistics treated as part of the
Arts and Humanities departments of university syllabuses.
Subsequently the subject fell more and more under the tutelage of the
Science departments. Matthews makes the very pertinent point that stereotyping
students into Arts or Science camps is to do them an injustice.
He believes that “Linguistics straddles this institutional rift”
between science and the humanities, for “what is the study of language,” he
asks, “but a ‘science’ . . . of something that lies at the heart of being
‘human?’.
And
with that ending to his first chapter he has laid his cloak over the quagmire into
which so many students of linguistics and language find themselves sinking in
despair. Thereafter his joy in his
subject transmits itself through every page and every section taking the reader
chronologically from the origins of languages as instruments of communication
between humans to recent scientific studies of
the physiological aspects of the brain in connection with human language
capacity.
What
I found most remarkable was the apparent ease with which Peter Matthews (who,
after all, has written some weighty stuff on the subject, including Morphology:
Introduction to the Theory of Word Structure, and the Concise Oxford
Dictionary of Linguistics) succeeds so admirably to avoid all detailed and
complex explanations, but manages to carry his reader along at a brisk – if
not breathtaking – and totally comprehensible pace .
The
more complex issues are readily available for readers who want to proceed
further (and who would not, having been so enticed by this book?) via his final
chapter on Further Reading, where excellent books covering the sub-linguistical
classifications of Morphology, Applied Linguistics, Psycholinguistics,
Neurolinguistics, Computational Linguistics, Phonetics, Semantics and Pragmatics
are briefly discussed.
In reviewing books in the OUP Very Short Introductions series, it becomes tedious to continually refer to their accessibility. After all, what other raison d’être could OUP have for a series containing the words “very short” in its title. But Peter Matthews is to be commended for his success in producing a brief work on a complex subject and making it so eminently readable.
[I have one petty quibble with Matthews. I consider it a pity that a Professor of Linguistics should allow himself to fall into the politically correct (but grammatically imperfect) trap [Page 8] of writing: "between each person and their female parent", when a convenient avoidance would have been to write "between all persons and their female parents" or, more cumbersomely, "between each person and his/her female parent". Or even - whisper it! - be damned to political correctness: "each person and his female parent".]
Joe Sinclair
Language Matters, A Guide to Everyday Thinking About Language, by Donna Jo Napoli. Oxford University Press 2003, 198 pages. ISBN 0-19-516048-7. Paperback £12.99
Starting to read this book shortly after having written the review of Linguistics above, and still having my parenthetical minor criticism in mind, I was delighted to read in Donna Jo Napoli's preface, "Linguistics is a field in which reasonable people can and do disagree. Nevertheless, in this book I am rarely equivocal (I'm a linguist, not a politician)." I could have hugged Donna Jo. There was no way I could now fail to enjoy her book. But I am sure I would have enjoyed it immensely anyway . . . and I have tried to review it impartially.
Napoli has divided her book into two parts: Language: the human ability; and Language in society. The first part may properly be termed linguistics, starting from how language is acquired, how we learn to understand it and to speak it. But it differs entirely in concept and in treatment from Matthews' Linguistics. Napoli is here wearing her practical teaching hat rather than providing an academic treatise. So not only is her text filled with an abundance of examples of how our mother tongue is acquired, but also how we learn other languages and why this is so much more difficult than learning our original language.
Furthermore she is writing in such a lucid, uncomplicated and unsophisticated style that readers might be forgiven for thinking it naive, until it suddenly dawns on them that they have absorbed a surprising insight into both original concepts and a new and unexpected way of re-examining our beliefs and the assumptions we make about language. "Take something simple" Napoli suggests at one point, " I love you. This can be interpreted one way when a nurturing parent speaks to her child; another way when a parent is inducing guilt in her child; another way when a couple decides to marry; another way when that couple has been married for fifty years; another way when a prostitute says it to a stranger who's paying her to say it; another way when a teenager is trying to manipulate a boyfriend or a girlfriend; another way when a child says it to a parent at the end of a long and wonderful day; and so on."
This is typical of her style in the first part of her book where Napoli continues to examine a variety of provocative and occasionally controversial questions, but always with ease and fluency. And, in case some questions that spring to the readers' minds remain unanswered (and they will, because the author is as adept at stirring up the readers own questions as she is at answering those she has posed) Napoli has provided a wealth of references at the end of each chapter, both to further reading and also (not unique, but pretty unusual in my experience) to web sites on the internet, all of those checked by me proving to be valuable sources of further information. Indeed, the website she recommends in her preface: www.uga.edu/lsava/Archive.html providing a series of videos on language set up by the Linguistics Society of America, so fascinated me that my reading of her book was delayed by several hours!
The second part of her book may be more arcane, but none the less readable and fascinating. Here she examines language in society, including the essential differences between dialects and standard language; how women and men speak differently and why this should be of little concern; the age-old question of whether the English spelling system needs overhauling, but addressed in a refreshingly unexpected way; whether offensive language harms children.
A wonderful book. I commend it to you unreservedly.
Joe Sinclair
‘Estelle Morris’ writes Paul Ginnis in his introductory section to